[slf4j-user] Question: supporting ALL, OFF level

[Joakim Erdfelt]

While slf4j is just a facade, there's a growing group of features in
various projects that put configuration at the slf4j api level (both at
startup and runtime), not at the slf4j implementation level.

Am I wrong in assuming that the stated scope of this was for this proposal
to have slf4j api level ability?

- Joakim

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 8:42 AM Ceki Gülcü <ceki at qos.ch> wrote:

>
>
> On 1/27/2022 2:55 PM, Joakim Erdfelt wrote:
> > I like it.
> >
> > OFF is definitely useful, and should be there.
> >
> > ALL on the other hand seems redundant.
> > Just setting the most noisy level (TRACE in slf4j terms) would be the
> > equivalent end result.
>
> Unless I am forgetting something or getting forgetful, SLF4J does not
> allow users to set levels.
>
> > - Joakim
>
> --
> Ceki Gülcü
>
> Sponsoring SLF4J/logback/reload4j at https://github.com/sponsors/qos-ch
> _______________________________________________
> slf4j-user mailing list
> slf4j-user at qos.ch
> http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qos.ch/pipermail/slf4j-user/attachments/20220127/5a2bfeaa/attachment-0001.html>