[slf4j-user] slf4j for Java 17?
Daniel Krügler
Daniel.Kruegler at gmx.de
Tue Jul 12 17:37:20 CEST 2022
Am 12.07.2022 um 17:31 schrieb Joakim Erdfelt:
> Eclipse Jetty dev here.
>
> We've been using slf4j 2.0.x for production servers since Dec 2020
> without issue.
> It's been highly reliable for the millions of servers that use Eclipse
> Jetty 10+.
>
> We chose slf4j 2.0.x as it properly supported JPMS, which is an
> optional execution mode for our server that many folks use.
>
> - Joakim
>
That really makes me wonder why slf4j 2.0 has never been released as
stable version? The current non-stable situation is a show-stopper for
us, we are not allowed to use it in productive code.
Thanks,
- Daniel
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 9:28 AM Christoph Briem
> <christoph.briem at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> sorry if this has been answered already anywhere else. But I
> couldn't find an answer so far.
>
> We're currently evaluating moving further from Java 11 to Java 17.
> We've realized that we also have to update slf4j, to either 1.8.x
> or 2.0.x.
>
> Right now, both minor versions are not marked as stable, and we're
> somehow reluctant using an alpha or beta version.
>
> My question is: What is your recommendation for people moving on
> to Java 17? Use 1.8.x or 2.0.0.x? Or wait until a stable release
> is out? Or is there a way to get 1.7.x running on Java 17?
>
> Thanks for your help,
> Chris
> _______________________________________________
> slf4j-user mailing list
> slf4j-user at qos.ch
> http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> slf4j-user mailing list
> slf4j-user at qos.ch
> http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qos.ch/pipermail/slf4j-user/attachments/20220712/dea4f4a9/attachment.html>
More information about the slf4j-user
mailing list