[logback-user] Why LGPL instead of Apache License?
bruce.snyder at gmail.com
Wed Dec 27 02:16:38 CET 2006
Log4J employs the Apache License and wound up being the inspiration for the
entire Logging Project at the ASF, why was the LGPL chosen as the license to
employ for Logback?
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Why-LGPL-instead-of-Apache-License--tf2884320.html#a8058617
Sent from the Logback User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the Logback-user