[logback-user] Approaches to implement RFC5424 structured data support

ceki ceki at qos.ch
Mon Jun 18 19:44:47 CEST 2012

On 18.06.2012 18:53, Ralph Goers wrote:

 > As you noted this subject has come up before. It was one of the things
 > that ultimately motivated me to go off and create Log4j 2.  I
 > abandoned the fork at Github when it became clear that there wasn't
 > going to be a good resolution to the issue.

I've got to admit, payload support in SLF4J/logback is pretty bad.


More information about the Logback-user mailing list