[slf4j-user] Replaceable MessageFormatter

Chris Pratt thechrispratt at gmail.com
Thu Dec 26 17:09:50 CET 2013


Hmmm, interesting point.  Would you be open to the possible extension of
the existing formatter?
  (*Chris*)


On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 2:19 AM, Ceki Gülcü <ceki at qos.ch> wrote:

>
> Hi Chris,
>
> It is not possible to configure a different  MessageFormatter than the
> default. The current API does not and will not support changing the
> MessageFormatter because allowing for such changes would open the door for
> errors. For example, if your application A depends on library L, and F1 and
> F2 are two formatting conventions, then if A uses format F1 and L uses F2,
> then any choice of formatting convention would cause errors either in A or
> in L.
>
> Merry Christmas and happy holidays,
>
>
> On 12/26/2013 6:52 AM, Chris Pratt wrote:
>
>> Ceki,
>>    I thought I had read that with the latest SLF4j it was possible to
>> configure a different MessageFormatter than the default.  But, looking
>> at the code, It doesn't appear possible.  What would I need to do to get
>> a code modification to SLF4j reviewed and possibly approved?  Is it as
>> simple as providing a GitHub Pull Request to you or is there something I
>> would need to sign before that would be allowed?  Thanks.
>>    (*Chris*)
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> slf4j-user mailing list
>> slf4j-user at qos.ch
>> http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
> slf4j-user mailing list
> slf4j-user at qos.ch
> http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qos.ch/pipermail/slf4j-user/attachments/20131226/d3358153/attachment.html>


More information about the slf4j-user mailing list