[cal10n-dev] Different IMessageConveyer implementations
Ceki Gulcu
ceki at qos.ch
Wed Sep 2 10:37:13 CEST 2009
Ralph Goers wrote:
> As you know, I'm no fan of java.util.ResourceBundle. Before you get too
> far down the road provision for alternate implementations needs to be
> put in place. I'm not sure how you intend to do that but it will
> probably affect the way SLF4J uses this.
Good point. The desired IMesssageConveyor instance could be injected into the
LocLoggerFactory. Thus, you could use a IMesssageConveyor not based on resource
bundles. I'll go and make the necessary changes in SLF4J.
> Ralph
--
Ceki Gülcü
Logback: The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging framework for Java.
http://logback.qos.ch
More information about the cal10n-dev
mailing list