[logback-dev] RFC: LoggingEvent redesign

Ceki Gulcu ceki at qos.ch
Wed Feb 25 16:09:29 CET 2009

Joern Huxhorn wrote:
 > I disagree. I just implemented an enhanced version of the log4j NDC
 > myself as you suggested on the SLF4J mailinglist. It's implemented quite
 > similar to the logback MDC but isn't serialized/used by any standard
 > appender. My multiplex-appenders, on the other hand, *are* evaluating
 > it, thus adding an additional data point to the LoggingEvent.
 > Wouldn't a similar extension be possible in Ralphs case?

How can multiplex-appenders access a field which does not exist in

Ceki Gülcü
Logback: The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging framework for Java.

More information about the logback-dev mailing list