[logback-dev] any plans for using LMAX's Disruptor technology for asynchronous logging?

[Tony Trinh]

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Brent <yhbrent at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Log4J2 is.  I recently stumbled across this link
>     http://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/async.html
> where they claim spectacular results.  In particular, Log4J2's AsyncLogger
> blows away Logback's AsyncAppender.
>
> It looks like several people have done their own experiments to have
> Logback use Disruptors for aynchronous logging.  For example:
>     https://github.com/reactor/reactor/tree/master/reactor-logback
> And this guy posted his results on Logback's user email list:
>     http://mailman.qos.ch/pipermail/logback-user/2013-August/004201.html
>
> I would like to know if there are any official plans to incorporate LMAX's
> Disruptor (or some equivalent) technology in Logback.  I searched this
> list, and could find no discussion.
>
>
No official plans yet, but I'm interested in incorporating it. We recently
mentioned Disruptor briefly in [1].

[1] https://github.com/qos-ch/logback/pull/170



> From my perspective, this is critical: fast asynchronous logging is of
> extreme importance for my current employer, and I bet many other people too.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qos.ch/pipermail/logback-dev/attachments/20140225/7bd61e45/attachment.html>