[slf4j-dev] [Bug 86] Add logging utility methods

[Ceki Gulcu]

Hi Ralph,

Have you seen the new Profiler implementation? I found it really useful.

Regardless of whether its your version or the one in logback, I agree that 
placing such code in slf4j-extension (or whatever) instead of logback is a very 
good idea.

Anyway, I'd be happy to look at your timing methods.

You might want to enter a bug report so that this does not fall through the cracks.

Ralph Goers wrote:
> I have a related question. I have built timing methods somewhat similar 
> to the StopWatch in logback. It seems more appropriate to me that these 
> be in SLF4J than logback since they really don't rely on any particular 
> logger implementation. I'd be happy to provide my version of these for 
> you to review if you have an interest.
> 
> Ralph
> 
> bugzilla-daemon at pixie.qos.ch wrote:
>> http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86
>>
>>
>> listid at qos.ch changed:
>>
>>            What    |Removed                     |Added
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>              Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------- Comment #2 from listid at qos.ch  2008-06-03 22:18 -------
>> Will look into this after 1.5.1 is released.
>>
>>
>>   
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> dev at slf4j.org
> http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev