[slf4j-user] more jcl classes in jcl104-over-slf4j.jar

[Eric Yung]

Hi Ceki,

I have test the one from svn and it works.


Thanks,
Eric

Ceki Gulcu wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> I was not aware that commons-configuration was using NoOpLog directly. Thank you 
> for the valuable information.
>
> I just added the o.a.c.l.impl.NoOpLog and SimpleLog classes to the 
> jcl104-over-slf4j project.
>
> Would you mind checking the code from SVN and then build it to see if it works?
>
> Many thanks in advance,
>
> Eric Yung wrote:
>   
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have download the commons-configuration 1.4 and found that they are 
>> using org.apache.commons.logging.impl.NoOpLog directly. I think it may 
>> be possible that the user of jcl will use either instantiate 
>> org.apache.commons.logging.NoOpLog or 
>> org.apache.commons.logging.SimpleLog as the default implementation when 
>> there is NO jcl logger found.
>>
>> I would suggest to include both classes into the jcl104-over-slf4j.jar 
>> as there is NO dependency for both classes. It saves a lot of trouble 
>> when someone is using the commons-configuration 1.4 like libraries. 
>> Right now, I have to extract those classes and include in my application 
>> manually.
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Eric
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> user mailing list
>> user at slf4j.org
>> http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>>
>>     
>
>