[slf4j-user] SLF4J library using an image

[Erik van Oosten]

Small correction: the 'original' version is David's (jakartaman).

For the rest I agree.

Regards,
     Erik.


Op 14-08-11 13:35, Thorsten Möller schreef:
> Am 13.08.2011 um 22:17 schrieb jakartaman:
>
>> Now someone needs to take a decision!!11!!
> Well, just my opinion: both make sense to me. Erik's original version clearly and tersely describes the (gradual) transition from a logging framework other than SLF4J up to the point where just SLF4J backed by Logback is used. And I presume depicting this transition was Erik's intention.
>
> Ceki's version appeared more comprehensive to me in depicting all the combinations in which SLF4J can be deployed. Honestly, however, I was interrupted a bit by the arrows since their semantics is not intuitive and was also not explained in the legend. To me they are not really necessary and I would prefer the typical layered way of depicting it using vertically stacked boxes.
>
> To conclude, both are reasonable to the projects documentation, just at different places: Erik's could be used for supporting one way (the preferred way?) of (gradually) moving from another logging framework to "pure" SLF4J logging; Ceki's could be used to support all the different deployment combinations.
>
> Thorsten
>
>
>
>
>> :-)
>>
>> On 08/13/2011 10:51 AM, Rusty Wright wrote:
>>> I definitely like http://slf4j.org/images/concrete-bindings.png
>>>
>>> Straightforward and clear.
>>>
>>> On 2011-08-12 12:32, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
>>>> I've taken yet another crack at this:
>>>>
>>>> http://slf4j.org/images/concrete-bindings.odg
>>>> http://slf4j.org/images/concrete-bindings.png
>>>>
>>>> http://slf4j.org/images/legacy.odg
>>>> http://slf4j.org/images/legacy.png
>>>>
>>>> The idea is to illustrate concrete binding setups using lots of arrows. :-)
>>>>
>>>> On 12/08/2011 9:04 AM, Erik van Oosten wrote:
>>>>> Hi David,
>>>>>
>>>>> I liked the clearness of your images as the result of using no arrows
>>>>> and different colors for each function. I did have troubles with the
>>>>> text, the font size is a tad small for me.
>>>>>
>>>>> The second image does not show that commons-logging attempts to find a
>>>>> logging implementation such as log4j, nor that is specially wired in the
>>>>> classpath of many servlet containers. Not sure how to do visualize that
>>>>> though.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Erik.
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> slf4j-user mailing list
>>> slf4j-user at qos.ch
>>> http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user
>> _______________________________________________
>> slf4j-user mailing list
>> slf4j-user at qos.ch
>> http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user
> _______________________________________________
> slf4j-user mailing list
> slf4j-user at qos.ch
> http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user


-- 
Erik van Oosten
http://www.day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/