[slf4j-user] SLF4J library using an image

[Thorsten Möller]

Am 14.08.2011 um 17:33 schrieb Erik van Oosten:

> Small correction: the 'original' version is David's (jakartaman).

uups, sorry ;-)

Thorsten


> 
> For the rest I agree.
> 
> Regards,
>    Erik.
> 
> 
> Op 14-08-11 13:35, Thorsten Möller schreef:
>> Am 13.08.2011 um 22:17 schrieb jakartaman:
>> 
>>> Now someone needs to take a decision!!11!!
>> Well, just my opinion: both make sense to me. Erik's original version clearly and tersely describes the (gradual) transition from a logging framework other than SLF4J up to the point where just SLF4J backed by Logback is used. And I presume depicting this transition was Erik's intention.
>> 
>> Ceki's version appeared more comprehensive to me in depicting all the combinations in which SLF4J can be deployed. Honestly, however, I was interrupted a bit by the arrows since their semantics is not intuitive and was also not explained in the legend. To me they are not really necessary and I would prefer the typical layered way of depicting it using vertically stacked boxes.
>> 
>> To conclude, both are reasonable to the projects documentation, just at different places: Erik's could be used for supporting one way (the preferred way?) of (gradually) moving from another logging framework to "pure" SLF4J logging; Ceki's could be used to support all the different deployment combinations.
>> 
>> Thorsten
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> :-)
>>> 
>>> On 08/13/2011 10:51 AM, Rusty Wright wrote:
>>>> I definitely like http://slf4j.org/images/concrete-bindings.png
>>>> 
>>>> Straightforward and clear.
>>>> 
>>>> On 2011-08-12 12:32, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
>>>>> I've taken yet another crack at this:
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://slf4j.org/images/concrete-bindings.odg
>>>>> http://slf4j.org/images/concrete-bindings.png
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://slf4j.org/images/legacy.odg
>>>>> http://slf4j.org/images/legacy.png
>>>>> 
>>>>> The idea is to illustrate concrete binding setups using lots of arrows. :-)
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 12/08/2011 9:04 AM, Erik van Oosten wrote:
>>>>>> Hi David,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I liked the clearness of your images as the result of using no arrows
>>>>>> and different colors for each function. I did have troubles with the
>>>>>> text, the font size is a tad small for me.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The second image does not show that commons-logging attempts to find a
>>>>>> logging implementation such as log4j, nor that is specially wired in the
>>>>>> classpath of many servlet containers. Not sure how to do visualize that
>>>>>> though.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Erik.
>>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> slf4j-user mailing list
>>>> slf4j-user at qos.ch
>>>> http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> slf4j-user mailing list
>>> slf4j-user at qos.ch
>>> http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user
>> _______________________________________________
>> slf4j-user mailing list
>> slf4j-user at qos.ch
>> http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user
> 
> 
> -- 
> Erik van Oosten
> http://www.day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> slf4j-user mailing list
> slf4j-user at qos.ch
> http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user