[slf4j-user] slf4j for Java 17?

Joakim Erdfelt joakim.erdfelt at gmail.com
Sat Aug 6 23:00:06 CEST 2022


Excellent news!

Thanks for keeping this project alive and up to date with modern java.

- Joakim

On Sat, Aug 6, 2022 at 3:58 PM Ceki Gülcü <ceki at qos.ch> wrote:

>
> Hello,
>
> SLF4J 2.0.0-beta0 was released yesterday. Version 2.0.0-beta1 will be
> released shortly and 2.0.0-RC0 should follow towards the end of the month.
>
> --
> Ceki Gülcü
>
> Sponsoring SLF4J/logback/reload4j at https://github.com/sponsors/qos-ch
>
>
>
> On 7/12/2022 5:37 PM, Daniel Krügler wrote:
> > Am 12.07.2022 um 17:31 schrieb Joakim Erdfelt:
> >> Eclipse Jetty dev here.
> >>
> >> We've been using slf4j 2.0.x for production servers since Dec 2020
> >> without issue.
> >> It's been highly reliable for the millions of servers that use Eclipse
> >> Jetty 10+.
> >>
> >> We chose slf4j 2.0.x as it properly supported JPMS, which is an
> >> optional execution mode for our server that many folks use.
> >>
> >> - Joakim
> >>
> >
> > That really makes me wonder why slf4j 2.0 has never been released as
> > stable version? The current non-stable situation is a show-stopper for
> > us, we are not allowed to use it in productive code.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > - Daniel
> >
> >> On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 9:28 AM Christoph Briem
> >> <christoph.briem at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>     Hi all,
> >>
> >>     sorry if this has been answered already anywhere else. But I
> >>     couldn't find an answer so far.
> >>
> >>     We're currently evaluating moving further from Java 11 to Java 17.
> >>     We've realized that we also have to update slf4j, to either 1.8.x
> >>     or 2.0.x.
> >>
> >>     Right now, both minor versions are not marked as stable, and we're
> >>     somehow reluctant using an alpha or beta version.
> >>
> >>     My question is: What is your recommendation for people moving on
> >>     to Java 17? Use 1.8.x or 2.0.0.x? Or wait until a stable release
> >>     is out? Or is there a way to get 1.7.x running on Java 17?
> >>
> >>     Thanks for your help,
> >>     Chris
> _______________________________________________
> slf4j-user mailing list
> slf4j-user at qos.ch
> http://mailman.qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/slf4j-user
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qos.ch/pipermail/slf4j-user/attachments/20220806/c320ebd5/attachment.html>


More information about the slf4j-user mailing list